A few thoughts on the upcoming sequester being imposed on our country by the 113th Congress:
The impending sequester does NOT reduce congressional pay because the 27th Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits Congress from varying it's own compensation until the seating of the next Congress.
"No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened."
Unfortunately this amendment is preventing the 113th Congress from leading by example in experiencing the pain of the sequester which they are imposing on the rest of the country. Therefore I propose created a FB page proposing a 28th Amendment to the US Constitution that would allow Congress to REDUCE their compensation immediately.
"Any law REDUCING the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives shall take effect immediately."
Please visit and LIKE this page if you support such an amendment. Maybe it will gain enough steam to get their attention. Let's give our leaders an opportunity to demonstrate some integrity.
http://www.facebook.com/USamendment28
Pages
Truth Be Told
Signed copies of the book I co-authored with Soong-Chan Rah, "Unsettling Truths - The Ongoing Dehumanizing Legacy of the Doctrine of Discovery" are available from my website: https://wirelesshogan.com/2019/12/18/available-now-unsettling-truths/.
Friday, February 22, 2013
Monday, February 18, 2013
Richard Twiss: A life of Conversations
On Saturday, February 9, 2013, surrounded by family and friends, Richard Twiss (Taoyate Obnajin - He Stands with his People) passed away after suffering a major heart attack 3 days earlier while he was in Washington DC to attend the National Prayer Breakfast. Richard was the president and founder of Wiconi Ministries based in Vancouver, Washington. He was 58 years old and is survived by his wife Katherine and his sons Andrew, Philip, Ian and Daniel.
I wish I could have been there with him, and his family, during those last few days and hours. But unfortunately I was 2,000 miles away at my home on the Navajo Reservation. I have had the privilege of knowing and working with Richard for the past 10 years. Most recently he and I served on the Board of Directors for the Christian Community Development Association (CCDA) together.
I wish I could have been there with him, and his family, during those last few days and hours. But unfortunately I was 2,000 miles away at my home on the Navajo Reservation. I have had the privilege of knowing and working with Richard for the past 10 years. Most recently he and I served on the Board of Directors for the Christian Community Development Association (CCDA) together.
Monday, February 11, 2013
A Biblical Response to Poverty
Recently, in a sermon titled "More than
survival" I preached on the issue of poverty. Most people define poverty in
financial terms. I define poverty as the inability to make
choices. The wealthy believe they are 'in control', and have options
while the poor believe they are 'out of control' and have no options.
According to the Scriptures, both of those beliefs are wrong but I would argue that the prior is more Biblically inaccurate than the latter.
So what should the response of the church be to poverty? Do we preach justice to the rich and exhort them to act rightly? Absolutely. Do we speak prophetically to our leaders and challenge them to hear the cries of their people? Without a doubt. Do we hold our own wealth with an open hand and give freely to those around us who are in need? Yes.
So what should the response of the church be to poverty? Do we preach justice to the rich and exhort them to act rightly? Absolutely. Do we speak prophetically to our leaders and challenge them to hear the cries of their people? Without a doubt. Do we hold our own wealth with an open hand and give freely to those around us who are in need? Yes.
Friday, January 11, 2013
Idle No More? Then we need to think big.
It has been exciting to watch this past month as indigenous
peoples from around the world have rallied around the commitment of Chief Spence
and the cry to be "Idle No More." It has been wonderful to read
about, watch, and even participate in events around Indian Country and to hear the
desire of native people, especially our youth, to be more directly involved in
the governance of our lands and the ruling of our people.
But if lasting change is to finally take place, then this
cannot just be a movement. The energy behind "Idle No More" cannot end with a meeting between Chief
Spence and Prime Minister Harper. And here in the US that energy cannot end with the
settling of a lawsuit, or the Presidency of Barack Obama. This conversation is
about so much more than just this moment in time and these particular events.
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
A Conversation for Reconciliation
Reconciliation is never easy, which is why it doesn't happen
very often. Reconciliation is not something that can be checked off of a list.
It is not a single event encapsulated in a moment of time. Reconciliation
begins with a conversation and ends with a relationship restored.
It was the morning of December 19, 2012 and I standing in
front of the US Capitol building in Washington DC. I had reserved that space
months in advance so I could host a public reading of H.R. 3326, the 2010
Department of Defense Appropriations Act.
I did this because page 45 of this 67 page document contained an
"apology to native peoples of the united states." In three years this
apology had not been announced, publicized, or read by either the White House
or Congress.
Thursday, December 20, 2012
A Public Reading of the Apology to Native Peoples of the United States.
On December 19, 2012 I had the privilege of hosting a Public Reading of the Apology to Native Peoples of the United States in front of the US Capitol in Washington DC. This apology was buried in H.R. 3326, the 2010 Department of Defense Appropriations Act. It was signed by President Obama on Dec. 19, 2009 but was never announced, publicized or read publicly by either the White House or the 111th Congress.
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Respecting the Indigenous hosts of this land
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 11 AM EST I am hosting a public reading of the 2010 Department of Defense Appropriations Act. I am doing so because page 45 of this 67 page document contains a generic, non-binding apology to native peoples on behalf of the citizens of the United States. This apology was not publicized by the White House or Congress, nor has it been read publicly by President Obama. As a result, a majority of the 350 million citizens of the United States do not know they have been apologized for. And most of the 5 million Indigenous Peoples of this land do not know they have been apologized to.
Throughout his term in office President
Obama has made significant and intentional steps to invite Native American
leaders to the table and to include them in the conversation. For that I am thankful.
I also appreciate the sincere
efforts that Governor Brownback has made to raise the need for an apology to
the Indigenous Peoples of this land.
And it is meaningful that the 111th
Congress passed legislation that both contained an apology to native Peoples
and urged the President and State governments to seek reconciliation.
However, the
wording of this apology and the way it was buried in an unrelated document is not the
most appropriate or respectful way to speak to the indigenous hosts of this
land. Additionally, it is concerning that this apology has not been clearly communicated
to our elders, many of whom personally endured the horrors of boarding schools,
re-location, and disenfranchisement.
So on the third
anniversary of the signing of this Act, I have reserved space in front of the
US Capitol. On that day, a diverse group of citizens are coming together
to publically read H.R. 3326. The
appropriations portion of this bill (pages 1–45) will be read by the Native
Americans in attendance in an effort to respectfully, yet clearly, highlight
the irony of burying such important and historic words in a Department of
Defense Appropriations Act.
I am also working to have the
apology portion of this Act (sub-section 8113) translated into several Native
languages. These translations will be
read by some of the non-native people in attendance. This will serve as a
reminder that when an apology is made it should be communicated as clearly and
sincerely as possible to the intended audience.
This Act has already been written,
passed, and signed. Now it needs to be
publicized so its intended audience can hear it and respond to it. But, I do not want the conversation to end
there.
Over the years, I have had the
privilege to travel throughout much of our country and even to many parts of
the world. One question I am frequently asked is, "How does it feel to be
Native American and live in the United States?" I often use this image to articulate to
people how it feels:
Being Native American and living in the United States feels
like our indigenous peoples are an old grandmother who lives in a very large
house. It is a beautiful house with plenty of rooms and comfortable furniture.
But, years ago, some people came into our house and locked us upstairs in the
bedroom. Today, our house is full of people. They are sitting on our furniture.
They are eating our food. They are having a party in our house. They have since
unlocked the door to our bedroom but it is much later and we are tired, old,
weak and sick; so we can't or don't come out. But the part that is the most
hurtful and that causes us the most pain, is that virtually no one from this
party ever comes upstairs to find us in the bedroom, sits down next to us on
the bed, takes our hand, and simply says, "Thank you. Thank you for
letting us be in your house."
One thing that has been taken from
our Indigenous Peoples has been our ability and the opportunity to be the hosts
of this land. In fact, today, we are so far removed from the role of host that
we often feel like forgotten guests in our own home.
The result of this reversal of roles
is that a huge chasm exists between Native America and the rest of the United
States. Pain and misunderstanding are
deep, and respect and partnership are minimal.
Following the reading of H.R. 3326 and the apology enclosed therein, I will come forward and share some of my story, concluding with this image of the grandmother in the house. In the past, when I have communicated this image publically, I have frequently been approached by individuals, both Natives and non-Natives. Many Natives have thanked me for articulating our pain in a way they have never had the words for. And many non-Natives have approached me and thanked me, for letting them live in our house. I cannot control people’s response nor do I even want to demand it. But I can share my thoughts and then allow space for people to respond and for understanding to grow.
So I invite you to consider my words. I invite you to attend this event on December 19, 2012. And I invite you to respond to my analogy of the grandmother in the house. Together, we have an opportunity to lead our country into a conversation that has never before taken place between the indigenous hosts of this land and the immigrants who have traveled here from every corner of the earth.
So I invite you to consider my words. I invite you to attend this event on December 19, 2012. And I invite you to respond to my analogy of the grandmother in the house. Together, we have an opportunity to lead our country into a conversation that has never before taken place between the indigenous hosts of this land and the immigrants who have traveled here from every corner of the earth.
This event will not mark the end of this
journey but rather the beginning. It is my
hope that we can establish safe and honest common ground where a national
conversation for reconciliation between Native America and the rest of our
country can begin.
To confirm your presence at this
event please RSVP on my website:
wirelesshogan.com/us_apology_to_natives/rsvp
This event will also be streamed LIVE at 11 AM EST on Dec. 19, 2012 on my Wirelesshogan YouTube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/wirelesshogan
This event will also be streamed LIVE at 11 AM EST on Dec. 19, 2012 on my Wirelesshogan YouTube Channel:
http://www.youtube.com/wirelesshogan
Or join our Facebook Page:
You can also contact me directly at:
A'he'hee'.
Mark CharlesThis post was first published on June 6, 2012 at 1:10 PM MDT.
Tuesday, November 6, 2012
A More Perfect Union
If I had to translate her words into Navajo, I would say “ádin.”
Ádin
means nothing, none, zero.
I couldn't believe my ears. I was visiting Iowa in the first
week of January during an election year. Presidential candidates were crisscrossing
the state—kissing babies, shaking hands, and pleading for the vote of everyone
they met. Campaign events were taking place in high school gymnasiums,
community centers, and local businesses throughout the state. Many of the
people I met had personal stories of meeting one of the candidates, shaking
their hands, and talking about their issues. There are 99 counties in the state
of Iowa, and a few of the candidates were taking the time to stop and hold
campaign events in each and every one of them. But there I was, just a day before
the caucuses, standing in the community center and tribal offices of the
Meskwaki Settlement near Tama, Iowa, with the tribe’s executive director telling
me that not a single presidential candidate had held a campaign event in their
community.
I shouldn't have been surprised. After all I live on the
Navajo Reservation. Our reserve is nearly 26,000 square miles with about
300,000 enrolled tribal members, and I cannot recall in my lifetime a
presidential candidate visiting our reservation and campaigning directly to our
people.
But for some reason I thought Iowa, during the primary
season, would be different. There, retail politics is the norm and EVERY vote
is supposed to count. But as I learned that afternoon, that is not entirely
true. Even for tribes living in the middle of one of the most heavily
campaigned to states in our country, I learned that the Founding Fathers’
vision for this country still prevailed in 2012.
As a nation we often point to the document signed in 1776 as
the foundation of our freedoms and the declaration of our principals. We hold
up the country’s Founding Fathers as great visionaries; men who had a hope of a
world of equality. But that is a myth. A legend. Their statement, "We hold
these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal..." was
not a Declaration of Independence for many of the people who lived in this land.
Rather, it was a Declaration of Dominance, a change of masters,
a limitation of freedom, and for some, the foundation for genocide. For we learned a few years later, when many
of these same men penned the Constitution of the United States of America, that
"all men" did not refer to women, African slaves, or Native
Americans. These groups were specifically excluded from participation in this
grand experiment. Their wombs, their labor, and their lands would be used. But
the people, the individuals, and their communities would not be allowed to
participate.
As this country expanded, specific policies were implemented
against Native Americans such as the Indian Removal Act of 1830 which gave
legal cover for atrocities, such as the Trail of Tears for the Cherokee in 1838
and the Long Walk for the Navajo in 1864. This country wanted our land, but not
our vote. They wanted our resources, but not our voices. In fact, Native
Americans were one of the last groups to receive the right to vote. The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 granted us
citizenship and the right to vote. But, because voting is a states’ right, the
states of New Mexico and Arizona effectively barred Native Americans from
voting until 1948. (ACLU - Timeline:
Voting Rights Act)
By studying our history, learning about these policies, and
living on our reservation, I have experienced firsthand that our Founding Fathers’
vision was to create a nation where the indigenous peoples of this land would
have as little opportunity as possible to participate in or influence the
governance of this country. Out of sight and out of mind is where they wanted
us. And to that end, they were largely successful.
Even today, presidential candidates are able to campaign and
get elected without ever needing to court the Native American vote. Decisions
regarding tribal sovereignty and treaty rights have been delegated to the
Bureau of Indian Affairs, now a part of the Department of the Interior. Our country can hold a national debate on immigration
reform without soliciting input from indigenous peoples, who for over 500 years
have borne the brunt of injustices perpetrated by “undocumented immigrants.”
But for me, the last straw that demonstrated the need for
more immediate change was when I learned that on December 19, 2009 the US
government officially apologized to Native peoples without even speaking to us.
Page 45 of the 2010 Department of Defense Appropriations Act (H.R. 3326)
contains a buried "Apology to Native Peoples of the United States." This
non-specific, non-binding apology was never publicized, announced, or
publically read by Congress or the President.
This apology and the way it was buried demonstrated the
severity of the situation, and that even today, in the 21st Century, Native
peoples are not considered equals in this land. So I decided that I had to
respond. If my government did not have the respect to read this apology and
communicate it directly to the elders, leaders, and peoples of our Native communities,
then I would do it—honestly, respectfully, and publically.
On the third anniversary of the signing of this Act, I have
reserved space near the Reflecting Pool in front of the US Capitol. On that day, a diverse group of citizens are
coming together to publically read H.R. 3326.
The appropriations portion of this bill (pages 1–45) will be read by the
Native Americans in attendance in an effort to respectfully, yet clearly,
highlight the irony of burying such important and historic words in a
Department of Defense Appropriations Act.
The apology portion of this Act (sub-section 8113) will be
translated into several native languages and be read by some of the non-native
people in attendance. This will serve as a reminder to our leaders that when an
apology is made, it should be communicated as clearly, sincerely, and respectfully
as possible to the intended audience.
I am proud to be Navajo, and I am proud to be an American. I love this country, and I love our land. I
know history cannot be changed, but I do believe the trajectory it puts us on
can be adjusted. I want to teach my children that they can read the Declaration
of Independence and the United States Constitution with pride and hope—not
because the Founding Fathers were perfect, but because they acknowledged they
were beginning a journey. They created a government where leadership was not
inherited and wrote a constitution that could be amended.
One of the reasons the swearing into office of Barack Obama
as the 44th President of the United States was such a historic event both for
our country and the world, was because as a nation we demonstrated that our
real strength is found, not in our wealth or in our military might, but in our
ability to change, to learn, and to adapt. The Founding Fathers may not have
ever envisioned that the Union they were establishing would someday elect as
its leader someone who did not look like them. But we did, and while the
transition was bumpy and the last four years have had its fair share of
turmoil, it happened and as a country we have grown.
So I am inviting you—our nation— leaders, citizens,
immigrants and Native peoples to join me on December 19, 2012, in front of the US Capitol Building and respectfully read H.R. 3326 and the apology enclosed therein. To take another
step in this journey by beginning A New Conversation in our
never ending quest to 'walk in beauty' and form a more perfect union.
Ahe'hee',
Mark Charles
Ahe'hee',
Mark Charles
My (Native) Vote
My early voting ballot is almost complete. I have done my
reading, finished my research, and ignored a sufficient amount of robo-calls
and attack ads. I have made my choices for county school superintendent, state
representatives, and even US Senator. But there is a gaping hole at the top of
my ballot...
Fiscal Responsibility:
Bi-partisanship:
You can also gain support without demonizing your opponent. There is a serious cost to campaigning primarily to your base. If you want to be President of the entire country, then you need to be willing to stand in the middle, between all sides, EVERY day. If you can't learn to do that when you are campaigning for office, then you will not be able to do it effectively when you are in office.
I hope Mr. Romney learns that the world is run through relationships and that the office of the President of the United States is the most relationally complex office he will ever encounter. If he wants to be taken seriously as a candidate for this office and if he hopes to positively represent our country in the US and throughout the world, then I promise him, he will have to learn to apologize.
So who am I going to vote for? I am not sure. But fortunately I have a few more hours to figure it out.
It is November 6, 2012, and after more than a year of
carefully following the presidential campaigns I still do not know which
candidate I am going to vote for. I am an independent voter but registered as a
democrat. On my Facebook page I identify
my political position as "a morally-conservative Democrat or a fiscally-irresponsible
Republican."
I live on the Navajo Reservation, and for the past six years
I have been brainstorming and discussing ways our country can more
intentionally include Native American into the political process. And this was
going to be my break out year; I was going to do everything I could to engage
with the candidates. I knew from history that they would make very little, if
any, effort to court the Native American vote. So I made plans to engage with
them.
In January, I flew to Iowa and New Hampshire, where I attended rallies, stopped by campaign offices, and visited campaign events. I wrote letters that I hand delivered to campaign offices and also published online. I also made numerous visits to Washington DC. I wrote letters to the White House and traversed the halls of the Senate and House offices on Capitol Hill in an effort to reach out and engage with anyone who would talk with me.
In January, I flew to Iowa and New Hampshire, where I attended rallies, stopped by campaign offices, and visited campaign events. I wrote letters that I hand delivered to campaign offices and also published online. I also made numerous visits to Washington DC. I wrote letters to the White House and traversed the halls of the Senate and House offices on Capitol Hill in an effort to reach out and engage with anyone who would talk with me.
And after 12 months, thousands of dollars in travel expenses
and weeks away from my community and my family.....NOTHING. The Native American vote was once again
largely ignored, and I did not get a single response from either candidate to
discuss native issues.
I should have known from the beginning it was going to be an
uphill battle.
Last November Mitt Romney released a campaign ad where he
promised that he "would never apologize for the United States of America.”
This did not sit well with me as a Native American, so I responded with an
article that I published on Dec. 19, 2011 (Indianz: Mitt Romney vows never to
apologize for US).
Through some comments that were made to that article that I
learned that exactly 2 years earlier President Obama had signed the 2010
Department of Defense Appropriations Act (H.R. 3326). On page 45 of this 67
page bill, was an "Apology to Native Peoples of the United States."
This apology had never been announced, publicized, or publically read by
Congress or President Obama. Even the press release from the White House
regarding the signing of H.R. 3326 made absolutely no mention of the enclosed
apology.
So now I was in a real quandary. On one side of the aisle
there was a candidate who was boldly stating to the country (and the world)
that he would "never apologize for the Unites State of America." And
on the other side of the aisle was the sitting President who did apologize but
never bothered to tell anyone about it.
Over the past year, I did not spend a lot of time listening
to the rhetoric from either campaign, nor did I put a lot of weight in either
of the candidate’s words. Instead, I tried to look at their character, their
courage, and their integrity.
Fiscal Responsibility:
It's hard to believe either candidate is going to be a true advocate for fiscal
responsibility when this has been the most expensive election in history. Over
$2 billion has been raised and spent on this campaign! Yes, that is billion
with a "B." To me that is like applying for a position as a dietician
or a personal trainer and walking into the interview 100 lbs overweight with a
Big-Mac in one hand, a Super-Big Gulp in the other, french fries stuffed into
your pockets, and chocolate frosting covering your lips! It’s hard to take
their words seriously.
Bi-partisanship:
It is also hard to believe the promises of either candidate to reach across the
aisle and lead our “entire” country when almost every word coming out of both
of their mouths for the past year has an attack on the other. If a presidential
candidate is truly serious about reaching across the aisle and forging some
sort of compromise, you would think that process would begin by showing a
little respect to his political opponent and his ideas.
Please understand, I not bitter, nor am I despondent. I
merely feel a need to voice my thoughts and articulate some of my frustrations
before this campaign is over. I also want to encourage our candidates, both of
them, one last time:
“You can do better.”
You can get your message out without breaking the bank. In
age of the internet, we live in a world where you have the ability to
communicate with a national, even global audience, for the price of a library
card. A billion dollars may add more flash and repetition, but it does very
little for the content and substance of your message. A little creativity goes a long way and can
save a ton of money.
You can also gain support without demonizing your opponent. There is a serious cost to campaigning primarily to your base. If you want to be President of the entire country, then you need to be willing to stand in the middle, between all sides, EVERY day. If you can't learn to do that when you are campaigning for office, then you will not be able to do it effectively when you are in office.
And finally, regarding the apology:
I hope Mr. Romney learns that the world is run through relationships and that the office of the President of the United States is the most relationally complex office he will ever encounter. If he wants to be taken seriously as a candidate for this office and if he hopes to positively represent our country in the US and throughout the world, then I promise him, he will have to learn to apologize.
And while I appreciate the sincere efforts that President
Obama has made to engage with Native leaders and communities, I feel a strong
need to exhort his courage. For when you
do apologize, you MUST communicate it. Clearly. Humbly. And Respectfully. Ignoring it doesn’t help. Stuffing it in a
bill that no one will ever read doesn’t help. And making casual references to
it in a proclamation three years later doesn’t help.
No one would marry a spouse or go into business with a
partner who vowed never to apologize. And no marriage or business partnership
would last if one of the partners never communicated their apologies, but
instead just assumed they were known.
President Obama and Governor Romney, if you want my vote for
the office of the “most powerful man in the world,” then you going to have to demonstrate
an ability to be one of the humblest men on earth.
So who am I going to vote for? I am not sure. But fortunately I have a few more hours to figure it out.
Saturday, September 29, 2012
A Definition of Racial Reconciliation
"In obedience to God, racial reconciliation is a commitment to building cross-cultural relationships of forgiveness, repentance, love and hope that result in walking in beauty with one another and God."
Years ago, when I was called to pastor the Christian Indian Center in Denver CO, the Creator put a burden on my heart to understand his heart and his call for Racial Reconciliation. So I started a small group and we did a survey of the Bible looking at as many references and stories in the Old and New Testaments that we could find regarding Racial Reconciliation. The above definition is what we came up with.
Mark Charles
Additional resources regarding Reconciliation:
- A Native American Perspective on Columbus Day (YouTube)
- Reconciliation, Justice and Worship (Blogger)
- A Public Reading of the "Apology to Native Peoples of the United States" (Blogger)
To contact me or to submit a speaking request. Please visit my website (wirelesshogan)
Years ago, when I was called to pastor the Christian Indian Center in Denver CO, the Creator put a burden on my heart to understand his heart and his call for Racial Reconciliation. So I started a small group and we did a survey of the Bible looking at as many references and stories in the Old and New Testaments that we could find regarding Racial Reconciliation. The above definition is what we came up with.
Mark Charles
Additional resources regarding Reconciliation:
- A Native American Perspective on Columbus Day (YouTube)
- Reconciliation, Justice and Worship (Blogger)
- A Public Reading of the "Apology to Native Peoples of the United States" (Blogger)
To contact me or to submit a speaking request. Please visit my website (wirelesshogan)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
